Twitter introduced a new test feature Tuesday that allows users to report misinformation they run into on the platform, flagging it to the company as \u201cmisleading.\u201d The test will roll out starting today to most users in the U.S., Australia and South Korea.<\/p>\n
In the new test, Twitter users will be able to expand the three dot contextual menu in the upper right corner of a tweet to select \u201creport tweet\u201d where they\u2019ll be met with the new option to flag a misleading tweet. The next menu offers users a choice to specify that a tweet is misleading about \u201cpolitics,\u201d \u201chealth\u201d or \u201csomething else.\u201d If they select politics, they can specify if the misleading political tweet pertains to elections and if they choose health they can flag a misleading tweet about COVID-19 specifically.<\/p>\n
Twitter has added a way for users to report election-related misinformation before, though previously those options were temporary features linked to global elections. Back in 2019, the platform rolled out the option to report misleading tweets about voting to help safeguard elections in Europe and India<\/a>.<\/p>\n Twitter suspends Marjorie Taylor Greene temporarily for spreading vaccine misinformation<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n The intention is to give users a way to surface tweets that violate Twitter\u2019s existing policies around election and pandemic-related misinformation<\/a>, two topics it focuses policy and enforcement efforts around. The user reporting system will work in tandem with Twitter\u2019s proactive systems for identifying potentially dangerous misinformation, which rely on a combination of human and automated moderation. For now, users won\u2019t receive any updates from the company on what happens to misleading tweets they report, though those updates could be added in the future.<\/p>\n While the new reporting feature will be available very broadly, the company describes the test as an \u201cexperiment,\u201d not a finished feature. Twitter will observe how people on the platform use the new misinformation reporting tool to see if user reporting can be an effective tool for identifying potentially harmful misleading tweets, though the company isn\u2019t on a set timeline for when to fully implement or remove the test feature.<\/p>\n Twitter broadly bans any COVID-19 tweets that could help the virus spread<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n For now, Twitter doesn\u2019t seem very worried about users abusing the feature, since the new user reporting option will plug directly into its established moderation system. Still, the idea of users pointing the company toward \u201cmisleading\u201d tweets is sure to spark new cries of censorship from corners of the platform already prone to spreading misinformation.<\/p>\n While the option to flag tweets as misleading is new, the feature will feed reported tweets into Twitter\u2019s existing enforcement flow, where its established rules around health and political misinformation are implemented through a blend of human and algorithmic moderation.<\/p>\n That process will also sort reported tweets for review based on priority. Tweets from users with large followings or tweets generating an unusually high level of engagement will go to the front of the review line, as will tweets that pertain to elections and COVID-19, Twitter\u2019s two areas of emphasis when it comes to policing misinformation.<\/p>\n The new test is Twitter\u2019s latest effort to lean more on its own community to identify misinformation. Twitter\u2019s most ambitious experiment along those lines is Birdwatch<\/a>, a crowdsourced way for users to append contextual notes and fact-checks to tweets that can be upvoted or downvoted, Reddit-style. For now, Birdwatch is just a pilot program<\/a>, but it\u2019s clear the company is interested in decentralizing moderation \u2014 an experiment far thornier than just adding a new way to report tweets.<\/p>\n Twitter\u2019s acquisition strategy: Eat the public conversation<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n