Competitors Volvo AB and Daimler Trucks are teaming up to produce hydrogen fuel cells for long-haul trucks, which the companies say will lower development costs and boost production volumes. The joint venture, which is called cellcentric, aims to bring large-scale \u201cgigafactory\u201d production levels of hydrogen fuel cells to Europe by 2025.<\/p>\n
While the two companies are teaming up to produce the fuel cells via the cellcentric venture, all other aspects of truck production will remain separate. The location of the forthcoming gigafactory will be announced next year. The companies also did not specify the production capacity of the forthcoming factory.<\/p>\n
Even as Volvo AB and Daimler Trucks used ambition-signaling terms like \u201cgigafactory\u201d \u2014 a term popularized by Tesla due to the giga capacity of its factories \u2014 executives added a few cautionary caveats to their goal. Europe\u2019s hydrogen economy will depend in part on whether the European Union can produce a policy framework that further drives down costs and invests in refueling stations and other infrastructure, executives noted in a media briefing. In other words, manufacturers like Daimler and Volvo that are looking to invest in hydrogen face a \u201cchicken and the egg\u201d problem: boosting fuel cell production only makes sense if it occurs in tandem with the buildout of a hydrogen network, including refueling stations, pipelines to transport hydrogen and renewable energy resources to produce it.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn the long run, I mean, this must be a business-driven activity as everything else,\u201d Volvo CTO Lars Stenqvist told TechCrunch. \u201cBut in the first wave, there must be support from our politicians.\u201d<\/p>\n
Together with other European truck manufacturers, the two companies are calling for a buildout of hydrogen refueling stations around Europe of around 300 by 2025 and around 1,000 by 2030.<\/p>\n
The Swedish and German automakers suggested policies such as a tax on carbon, incentives for CO2-neutral technologies or an emissions trading system could all help ensure cost-competitiveness against fossil fuels. Heavy-duty trucking will only compose a fraction of hydrogen demand, around 10%, Stenqvist pointed out, with the rest being used by industries such as steel manufacturing and the chemical industry. That means the push for hydrogen-supportive policies will likely be heard from other sectors, as well.<\/p>\n
\nBosch sees a place for renewable fuels, challenging proposed European Union engine ban<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
One of the biggest challenges for the new venture will be working to decrease inefficiencies associated with converting hydrogen to electricity. \u201cThat\u2019s the core of engineering in trucking, to improve the energy efficiency of the vehicle,\u201d Stenqvist said. \u201cThat has always been in the DNA of engineers in our industry \u2026 energy efficiency will be even more important in an electrified world.\u201d He estimated that the cost of hydrogen would need to be in the range of $3-4 per kilogram to make it a cost-effective alternative to diesel.<\/p>\n
Volvo is also making investments in battery electric technologies and Stenqvist said he sees potential use cases for internal combustion engines (ICE) run on renewable biofuels. He is in agreement with Bosch executives who said<\/a> earlier this month that they see a place for ICE in the future. \u201cI\u2019m also convinced that there is a place for the combustion engines for a long period of time, I don\u2019t see any end, I don\u2019t see any retirement date for the combustion engines,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom a political side, I think it would be completely wrong to ban a technology. Politicians should not ban \u2014 should not approve technologies \u2014 they should point out the direction, they should talk about what they want to achieve. And then it\u2019s up to us as engineers to come up with the technical solutions.\u201d<\/p>\n
\n